Skip to main content

Blog

Go Search
2009-2010
Blog
Wiki
Teacher Profiles
  

2009-2010 > Blog
Members of the 2009-2010 NAIS Teachers of the Future Cohort will post to this group blog weekly on a variety of technology and curriculum topics.
Lessons for Sale?
Winnie Hu recently wrote an interesting NY Times article called Selling Lessons Online Raises Cash and Questions.  Here's the text of the article:

November 14, 2009
Selling Lessons Online Raises Cash and Questions
By WINNIE HU

Between Craigslist and eBay, the Internet is well established as a marketplace where one person’s trash is transformed into another’s treasure. Now, thousands of teachers are cashing in on a commodity they used to give away, selling lesson plans online for exercises as simple as M&M sorting and as sophisticated as Shakespeare.

While some of this extra money is going to buy books and classroom supplies in a time of tight budgets, the new teacher-entrepreneurs are also spending it on dinners out, mortgage payments, credit card bills, vacation travel and even home renovation, leading some school officials to raise questions over who owns material developed for public school classrooms.

“To the extent that school district resources are used, then I think it’s fair to ask whether the district should share in the proceeds,” said Robert N. Lowry, deputy director of the New York State Council of School Superintendents.

The marketplace for educational tips and tricks is too new to have generated policies or guidelines in most places. In Fairfax County, Va., officials had been studying the issue when they discovered this fall that a former football coach was selling his playbook and instructional DVDs online for $197; they investigated but let him keep selling.

A high school English teacher in upstate New York said her bosses barred her from selling plans used in her classroom; she spoke on the condition that she not be named.

Beyond the unresolved legal questions, there are philosophical ones. Joseph McDonald, a professor at the Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development at New York University, said the online selling cheapens what teachers do and undermines efforts to build sites where educators freely exchange ideas and lesson plans.

“Teachers swapping ideas with one another, that’s a great thing,” he said. “But somebody asking 75 cents for a word puzzle reduces the power of the learning community and is ultimately destructive to the profession.”

Teachers like Erica Bohrer, though, see the new demand for lessons as long-awaited recognition of their worth.

“Teaching can be a thankless job,” said Ms. Bohrer, 30, who has used the $650 she earned in the past year to add books to a reading nook in her first-grade classroom at Daniel Street Elementary School on Long Island and to help with mortgage payments. “I put my hard-earned time and effort into creating these things, and I just would like credit.”

The humble lesson plan has gained value as focus on testing and individualized instruction has increased. At the same time, the Internet has diminished the isolation of classroom teachers. Just about every imaginable lesson for preschool through college is now up for sale — on individual teachers’ blogs as well as commercial sites where buyers can review and grade the material.

Teachers Pay Teachers, one of the largest such sites, with more than 200,000 registered users, has recorded $600,000 in sales since it was started in 2006 — $450,000 of that in the past year, said its founder, Paul Edelman, a former New York City teacher. The top seller, a high school English teacher in California, has made $36,000 in sales.

Another site, We Are Teachers, went online last year with a “knowledge marketplace” that includes lesson plans and online tutoring.

Kelly Gionti, a teacher at the High School for Law, Advocacy and Community Justice in Manhattan, has sold $2,544 worth of unit plans for “The Catcher in the Rye” and “The Great Gatsby,” among others, helping finance trips to Rome and Ireland, as well as class supplies.

Margaret Whisnant, a retired teacher in North Carolina, earns an average of $750 a month from lessons based on her three decades of teaching middle school classics like “The Outsiders,” enough to pay for new kitchen counters and appliances.

“I have wanted to redo my kitchen for 20 years, and I just could not get the funds together,” she said. “Well, now I’m going to have to learn to cook.”

Lisa Michalek, 40, who taught for six years in Rochester and now works for Aventa Learning, a for-profit online education company, said she spent about five hours a week tweaking old lesson plans and creating new ones, like an earth science curriculum that sells for $59.95.

“I knew I had good lessons, so I thought, ‘Why not see what other people think of it?’ ” Ms. Michalek said.

After $31,000 in sales, she has her answer. Alice Coburn, 56, a vocational education teacher in Goshen, N.Y., said she saved two to three hours each time she downloaded Ms. Michalek’s PowerPoint presentations instead of starting from scratch. “I hate reinventing the wheel,” Ms. Coburn said.

Others find comfort in having a class-tested lesson by a more experienced teacher. Lauren Perreca, 24, used a $10 lesson on the Vietnam War novel “Fallen Angels” as a reference last year while creating her own lesson for her classes at Weston High School in Connecticut. She also revised her reading questions about “Lord of the Flies” after comparing them with two other lesson plans.

“At first I was self-conscious I had bought something, because what did that say about me?” she said. “But I realized I wasn’t just taking it and using it, I was adapting it to fill in the gaps of my knowledge.”

Now Ms. Perreca has started selling her own lesson plans, like a 54-page “Macbeth” unit with quizzes and homework assignments ($10) that she wrote in graduate school. She said she spent $140 of her $523 in earnings on cookies and books for her students, and used the rest to splurge on dinners out that she could not otherwise afford.

Her students are incredulous. “They’re like, ‘Who would want to buy those? They’re so boring,’ ” Ms. Perreca said. “I’m like, ‘Hey, I’m making money.’ ”

In Ms. Bohrer’s class the other day in Lindenhurst, N.Y., five children were counting M&Ms while she made sure they digested the lesson before the candy. The exercise, which comes with directions, sorting mats and work sheets, has sold 31 times for $3 a pop. A variation with Lucky Charms is popular around St. Patrick’s Day, she said.
“M&M sorting is not a new concept,” said Ms. Bohrer, who has been teaching since 2001. “I made it easier for teachers to do. They just have to click and print.”

Daniel Street’s principal, Frank Picozzi, said he supported Ms. Bohrer’s online business because his students reaped the benefits of her initiative and creativity.

Ms. Bohrer recalled that when she used to share her lesson plans at no charge, a poster of her reading strategies was passed around so many times that it ended up with a teacher in another school who had no idea where it came from.

“I’ll share with friends,” Ms. Bohrer said, “and if anyone else likes it, I’ll tell them where to buy it.”



What do you think about teachers selling their lessons online?   
Educational Excellence-What does it mean
I am on a task force at my school that is working on a number of things. One of the things we are investigating is our mission and how we interpret it. So, here is our mission:

"The Shipley School, a Pre-Kindergarten through 12 coeducational day school, is committed to educational excellence and dedicated to developing in each student a love of learning and a compassionate participation in the world. Through a strong college preparatory curriculum in the humanities and sciences, the school encourages curiosity, creativity, and respect for intellectual effort. Shipley upholds and promotes moral integrity, a sense of personal achievement and worth, and concern for others at school and in the larger community."

The ideas of "educational excellence," "love of learning," and "compassionate participation in the world" are the phrases we are looking at right now. In our first discussion, we decided to begin with "educational excellence" and that meant first defining what it means today and what it should mean in ten years. We certainly did not come up with a definitive answer.

Many things MIGHT be included; that list would be endless. What I am wondering is what you believe MUST be included?
Can this new generation bridge a cultural gap without leaving their home?

It is my assessment that our media-driven culture has created a world where we can access nearly anything we desire with minimal effort. There is no doubt that this has had a profound effect on all of us, but nowhere is this effect greater than upon our youth.  This is the world we live in.  Those of us old enough to remember life before cell phones, video games, and personal computers view the world differently from those too young to remember.  These are the Millennials!  This high-tech, instant gratification, celebrity-obsessed world is, in many cases, their ONLY reality.  This is the reality in which this new generation of kids is coming of age.  In my view, these youngsters are entitled, over-scheduled, collaborative, wise beyond their years, globally minded, environemtally aware  and technologically intuitive.  Moreover, they are coming of age and beginning to speak up…indeed, they are demanding to be heard! 

This generalization and my labeling them as Millennials can be used as a tool, or medium, to better understand who they are and more importantly why they are the way they are, in classrooms, in the workplace and in their home.  This Millennial Generation, as they have come to be known,  knows how to use technology without resorting to reading instruction manuals.  This total immersion in technology sparks a frightening observation - their entire life, every picture, text, every e-mail, every electronic message on Face Book®, Blogs, or Twitter® cannot only be traced, but documented! Will past text messages, e-mails and blogs come back to haunt these yougsters when they are applying for a job or  will they resurface in route to becoming  the next president of the United States?  I am doubtful that they think about this when they press the send button dozens of times a day. Another possibility is that eventually there may be so much information that its value will diminish and people may once again fade into anonymity. The average number of monthly texts for a 13- to 17-year-old teen is 1,742, according to a Nielsen study of cellphone usage.

Across generations the constant refrain to describe the differences is: “Oh, kids these days!” or the inevitable camparison to previous generations, that often sounds something like:  “When I was your age, I had to walk to school, without shoes, in two feet of snow, uphill both ways—and I liked it! And when we got home there were only three black and white channels on the TV, and we liked that too!”

Are there any truths behind these comparisons?  Are we really lowering our expectations of today’s youth?  What do we do about this sense of entitlement—will enough ever be enough?  Is it possible that in trying to meet the demands of our fast-paced, multi-tasking world,  these kids are struggling with the pressures of adolescence and simply trying to make sense of an explosion of information and multisensory distractions that actually make very little sense?  Who can make sense of 500 satellite channels, let alone the rest of the media blitz everyone swims in?

Is it possible that this new generation is doing what every generation did in the past—that is, adapting to their environment and learning to cope?  Generations, as we know them, have for the most part been based on American history.  Events, wars and breakthroughs have defined our past generations within the framework of our borders.  Some have said there is a cycle every four generations; while each generation within the four has distinct traits; the pattern repeats itself, revealing simliarties in corresponding cycles.  To me, this only seems possible when looking at the most general of traits, vast sweeping values that could be applied to fit the “cycle model” such as pesimistic, optimistic, idealistic and so on.

The cycle model could offer some great insight in predicting the next generational mindset in America. However, for the first time in history, we have a global generation!  I would argue that the Millennials are not solely an American generation.  Anyone who has traveled abroad recently notices immediately the youth in foreign countries are acting and doing the same things as American youth, ie. texting, e-mailing, multi-tasking and technology comsumed.  As a teacher, I have spent the last four summers abroad taking note of the “foreign Millennials”.  I would go as far as to say, aside from different languages, trendoidal fashions and the like, they are eerily similar to “Anytown, U.S.A”, ie. teenagers hanging out at the mall.  Furthermore, I would say you could easily mesh a group of American teens with foreign teens and they would relate and connect with ease and enthusiasm.  Indeed, I have been privileged to take my students to foreign countries for first hand observation of this phenomenon.

This was not the case when I traveled abroad for the first time 15 years ago.  I tried to connect with local kids abroad as an enthusiastic, bright-eyed high school senior who was fascinated with the differences of a foreign country.  The gap was too large to bridge; they were too different and there were too many barriers. 

However, this theory of global Millennials is proven every day, not through an arranged meeting, but through the our perpetual connectedness to the Internet.  They interact daily with kids all over the world.  To them it is “no big deal”…and the kids abroad do and think the same way.  They are quite literally a global generation. 

Millennials are in Europe, Australia, the Middle East, Far East, Africa and South America; the problem is, if these peers are so similar to us, then how could it be that Hector in Argentina doesn’t have the same luxuries as we do?  Why does this new friend abroad (who is as smart as me, likes the same things as I do and is basically the same as all my neighborhood friends) have to (or choose to) travel by foot two hours a day to go to school?  Or perhaps he doesn’t have the ability or freedom to speak his mind because of a perceived “difference” as defined by: learning style, religion, ethnicity, race, national origin, sexual orientation or gender. These Millennials are aware of these desparites and understand diversity is our strength and a cause for celebration!

Can this new generation bridge the final gap toward global citizenry, responsibility and human rights?  I believe, if anyone can do it, they can!  But will they ever actually go abroad?  Is the globalized world suffocating youthful wanderlust?  After all, they have seen it all and done it all – online! 

-Ramsey Brookhart - Excerpt from Globalistic: writings from a millenial classroom. www.globalistic-book.com

Really Good Teaching

Really Good Teaching

Teachers who make a lifelong difference to their students do not teach algebra, art, French, science or any other particular subject. Certainly, or at least I hope, we have all had outstanding, fascinating master teachers in one or more of these subjects. But do we remember them solely for the subject content? I would bet not. Rather we remember them because they changed us in some far more fundamental way.
          These teachers did not negate who or what we were; they may have negated some of our actions. They did not let us stay as we were; they used the subject to change us. And they never accepted the idea that learning the content was enough. They used the content as a springboard to the questions that really interested us: questions about us.
         Master teachers have the competence, life experience, and compassion to achieve a tripartite goal of teaching content, increasing the student’s capital by nurturing self-confidence and self-knowledge, and guiding the student’s discovery of meaning in their life. In short, the teachers who made a lifelong difference to us did so by increasing, sometimes dramatically, our historicity.
         The most remarkable thing about this whole process is that we, as students, allowed them to do this to us. In fact, although we were probably inarticulate in saying so, we craved it. Not because the process was easy; it generally was not. Not because we understood what was happening; I’m not sure we knew anything was happening. Most of us do not remember very many details of what was taught. What we remember is a connection built on trust, not between equals; we always knew who was in charge.

Although it was a mutual trust, the foundation was a trust first extended by the teacher based on a belief that, no matter how it seemed, we were living and doing the best we knew. This trust met us where we were with a confidence that empowered us to go beyond who we were, what we knew, and what we thought we could do.
          Initially, we met this extended trust with distrust. Nobody had trusted us like this before except maybe our parents and sometimes not even them. But after a while, we met trust with trust and we gave as good as we got. We trusted with a confidence that allowed us to explore. We learned the content, but it was not always safe and accepted. We accrued internal and social capital through action. And more important, our worldview was shaken and our character shaped.
          This kind of connection, relationship, or interaction between teacher and student is the single most powerful part of the student’s school experience. Without this kind of relationship, schooling, at worst, is deadening drudgery and, at best, an exercise in mediocrity with little or no impact on the student’s or society’s historicity. Nothing the federal government, the state government, or the school district does will improve education and schooling nearly as much as recognizing the impact and magic created by a master teacher connecting with students.

 

N.B. –This posting is based on my book, Master Teachers Making a Difference on the Edge of Chaos, Rowman & Littlefield

 

Honor Code

We are taking a hard look at how we "present" honor, deal with honor, establish consistency between teachers, and reduce infractions of honor. Some teachers have students sign a "pledge" on each submission, some don't. Some have different definitions of what honor actually is, and when it applies. Some teachers bring it daily into the classroom; others do not address it formally. It is an important element of any top notch academic program, and with the caliber of teacher selected for this program, it will be interesting to hear your thoughts on this topic.

to AP or not to AP?
There is an interesting discussion to be had based on the premise that schools seem compelled to have a variety of AP offerings. But, do we ever stop to think about the impact this has on our curriculum? Before we just respond that AP is the highest we can go and the best we can do, let me throw out some ideas for consideration: I think we would all be amazed at the impact that AP programs have on our own school's scheduling, class offerings, teacher motivation, student motivation, electives, and even early tracking. Our best teachers are teaching a curriculum that they did not create or have sayso in its creation. Those same teachers spend months preparing students for a test they did not create, nor can see in advance or in some cases even afterwards. Those same teachers teach, at some point, to a test, though we all agree that is a terrible thing to do.  Many excellent colleges and universities do not accept AP test results. Except in areas such as Fine Arts, portfolios are not a part of evaluation, yet who wouldn’t agree that a portfolio is a better reflection of learning and understanding than any standardized test, which are often in multiple choice formats.  NASA does not need people who do well on fill-in-the-blank tests, they need people who can solve problems and use resources.   In Computer Science, a computer is not even part of the AP test(yet, in foreign language it is).There are many even copyright restrictions from College Board about what material students can have access to throughout the year at home and at school. The audit process, created to bring credibility and consistency to the program, I think we can all agree was a farce. OK, that ought to get this ball rolling! I am sure I got a few of you fired up.  I look forward to hearing your thoughts
Defining "Teacher of  the Future"

I have been thinking a lot about what it means to be a ‘teacher of the future’.  What automatically comes to my mind is the ability to use new technologies in the classroom, frequently integrate those technologies into the curriculum, and allow students the opportunity to use those technologies as tools for learning.

As I work on my video (to be uploaded this week), I do not feel like a ‘teacher of the future’.  Although I am daily using PowerPoint and a SmartBoard in my classes, I rarely utilize all of the amazing material available on the Internet.  I only have a couple of computer-based lab activities for my students.  I do a lot of writing on the board and traditional lecture.

But I am a ‘teacher of the future’, so the definition I had in mind must be too narrow.  Upon further reflection (and struggles with creating my video), I have determined that a ‘teacher of the future’ is also one who prepares students for the future and provides them with skills to help shape their futures.

My passion is teaching young people about environmental science and sustainability.  Part of my school’s mission is to prepare our students to “…succeed in a complex and changing world”.  If we are not teaching them about environmental sustainability, we are failing at that mission.  Understanding the way the world works and the role humans play on this earth is fundamental to the growth of students.  I am a teacher of the future because, every day, I am preparing my students to be positive and knowledgeable agents of change in this complex and changing world.   Even though I might have trouble using a SmartBoard.

Historicity & Essential "Guideposts"
I enjoyed watching Dexter Chapin's video on his profile page. I had never heard this word "historicity" before, so I don't know if I spelled it correctly. I'm intrigued by this concept. It seems to be about helping a person understand themselves and how change in self occurs, or the nature of learning. This seems an essential purpose of education-- by definition, learning=change. 

The other part of his video also intrigues me-- on the purpose of establishing "guide posts" or an over-arching framework for major concepts. The idea of his teaching lesson (with the diagram by Gregory Bateson below) is a great example of giving students an essential overview or big picture in order to guide their ability to grapple with issues and problems that come up allowing them to put those issues into context. This approach is so vital to helping students understand big topics. Too often, it seems like we dive into the minutia of a lesson objective without giving students a schema for understanding how the parts of a given system or problem work together (including an ethical and moral context.)

Thanks Dexter, for these big ideas!

Tracking: Educational Best Practice?

I recently read an ASCD book by Carol Corbett Burris and Delia T. Garrity called Detracking for Excellence and Equity.  The book is a must-read as it challenges the reader to evaluate some deeply embedded assumptions about education.  Here are a few compelling quotes:

“Tracking, by its very nature, causes the achievement gap to widen.”

In a tracked system, the “talents of late bloomers go undiscovered.”

“Track movement occurs in a downward direction far more frequently than it does in an upward direction.”

“When schools are determined to level the playing field for disadvantaged students and ensure that all have access to their finest curriculum, students begin to see college and career possibilities that before seemed out of reach.”

“The reality is that you can’t close the achievement gap until you close the curriculum gap that is created by tracking.”

“The practice of tracking is based on the belief that the capacity to learn is shaped by biology ad childhood environment and that there is little that schools can do to affect learning capacity.”

Burris and Garrity are persuasive and credible because they support their assertions with research and firsthand experience as former teachers and current administrators in New York.  They’ve witnessed the achievement gap and apathy that occur as a result of tracking and worked for a superintendant who claimed “By the year 2000, 75% of all South Side High School students will earn a Regents diploma” – quite a bold statement given it represented a 17% increase from the number of students receiving the Regents diploma when superintendent William H. Johnson set the goal in 1993.  By 2000, 84% of South Side H.S. students earned a Regents diploma and in 2005 that number increased to 97% as a result of a systematic and purposeful elimination of tracked courses.

In their book, Burris and Garrity outline the “Three Ps” that sustain tracking: prejudice (intellectual, racial, and socio-economic), prestige (teacher, parent, and student), and power (parent, teacher, administrator, and board member).  The authors acknowledge that “the most difficult phase of detracking is when a school begins to question its assumptions and beliefs about teaching practices” but frequently reinforce that it is important to differentiate the learning experiences but not the standards or learning objectives because “by altering methods of instruction in heterogeneous classes, we can accomplish what tracking never could – excellent educational experiences for all students.”

Does your school track students?  If so, what is the basis of tracking?  Does the tracking accommodate “late bloomers”?  How do you react when you hear a colleague say “Student X doesn’t belong in this course!”?  Does this sort of sentiment imply that a teacher is powerless to affect student learning?  Do the “Three Ps” impact course placement of students at your school?

To Test or Not to Test
a) Good
b) Bad
c) a and b
d) none of the above

I have many thoughts on issues I see with the current education model in the United States. Though we've had many reforms and initiatives over the years, we basically have the same system we've always had, which is based on an old English model from the mid 19th century. I think if the world, not just us, wants to help our students reach levels that are currently not being reached, then we've got to completely reinvent the way we teach, evaluate, and change the expectations we have of our teachers, students, and parents.

One of the things which I have been able to do (I think) with good success is that I found a way to have an engaging class, where students work hard, submit projects, take the work seriously, and enjoy it. And I do that with very few tests (in fact, only 1, and even that one is very different than your standard test).  In class after class, school after school, in country after country, our kid’s main motivation for learning is for the test. Their life revolves around tests. They either just took one, are studying for one, are planning to attend the after school in preparation for test, are taking SAT prep classes, and are enrolled in AP classes, are copying someone’s notes so they can start to get ready for the test, Now, there are a few select students who this does not apply to, but so many of kids are simply not motivated to learn for learning sake because we do not allow them to.  We as teachers are even somewhat guilty of holding test grades like a carrot out front, when all we really want is for them to open their eyes and just “let it in”. We know they’ll love it if they stop stressing and worrying about whether or not this is on the test. So ask yourself, does your class and grading system allow for students to give you their best day –to-day, or does it lean towards giving their best every two weeks on  major tests, which count 75% of their grades. If we want learning in the Aristotle curiosity kind of way, shouldn’t our grading policies be completely flipped around? Shouldn’t it be50% daily participation and projects and presentations, 25% homework, and then maybe 25% for tests?  And if we detest, are they hands on tests? Are they thinking tests? Are they tests where they have not necessarily seen everything that’s on it? Or are we asking them to give back what we gave them? Whew! My guess is most of us in this group, because we were selected based on innovation in the first place, probably do things a lot more like the latter.
I am reading a book, The Brain that Changes Itself (Doidge) and it gives a heartwarming story (ch 2) of a girl, Barbara, who was born with a series of very serious learning disabilities. She had  no way for her right and left sides of the brain to talk to each other, so she could not understand cause and effect, behavior consequence, logic, symbols (such as writing), spatial capacity, and so on. Basically there was no way for her to function in society in any meaningful way. But, there was one thing she was able to do. She could memorize things. She had no understanding of what she was memorizing. She could memorize an answer (5+5=10), but have no idea why that is the case. But that is not the saddest part of the story. She did get through school. In Elementary school, while everyone else was out playing, she was memorizing. And she got through. In high school, she was able to get 100s on some test because they were only regurgitation. She comments that she knew she would fail miserably if they made here think. And they did not. I give her great credit for figuring out how to make it in the world despite her learning problems. However, as a teacher, that terrifies, angers, and energizes me to ask out loud, “How could a girl who by her own admission, and scientific evidence to prove it, does not have an ability to think, reason, and figure out….How is it that she can get through our school system. “ As a whole, do we really not ask our kids to think?
1 - 10 Next

 ‭(Hidden)‬ Admin Links